US 'may delay presidential vote if attacked'

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,228
Tokens
Would any of our RX Neocons think delaying the election process is an option?

Adolf Bush wouldnt, would he?

-------------------------
US 'may delay vote if attacked'

Security is a major issue in the upcoming US elections
The Bush administration is reported to be investigating the possibility of postponing the presidential election in the event of a terror attack.
US counter-terrorism officials are examining what steps would be needed to permit a delay, Newsweek reports.

Homeland Security chief Tom Ridge last week warned al-Qaeda was planning to attack the US to disrupt the poll but conceded he had no precise information.

A senior Democrat in Congress has said talk of postponement is "excessive".


Doomsday scenarios

In its latest edition, Newsweek reports that Mr Ridge has asked the Justice Department to examine what legal steps would be needed to permit the postponement of the 2 November election.

This follows a letter from the chairman of the new Election Assistance Commission, DeForest Soaries, who urged Mr Ridge to seek emergency legislation from Congress that would allow his agency to reschedule the vote in the event of an attack.

If they do this, boy, my God, they're extremely desperate

Ciro Rodriguez
Democrat Congressman
Mr Soaries noted that while New York's board of elections suspended primary elections on 11 September 2001, "the federal government has no agency that has the statutory authority to cancel and reschedule a federal election."

Homeland Security Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse told Newsweek, "We are reviewing the issue to determine what steps need to be taken to secure the election."

Republican Representative Christopher Cox, who chairs the House Homeland Security Committee, told CNN that it was prudent to prepare for a postponement.

"These are doomsday scenarios. We don't have any intelligence to suggest that it is going to happen, but we're preparing for all of these contingencies now."

Old information

But Jane Harman, the senior Democrat on the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee, said proposing a postponement would be "excessive based on what we know".


She also criticised Mr Ridge's suggestion that al-Qaeda was planning to disrupt the election, saying the warning was based on old information.

The BBC's Justin Webb in Washington says the Democrats' unspoken fear is that the White House will play on the nerves of Americans as the election nears, hoping to gain support from a nation fearful of any change in course.

It is a difficult strategy for the Democrats to counter.

If they appeared complacent and terrorists did strike, they would be politically destroyed, he says.

No US presidential election has ever been postponed.

Abraham Lincoln was urged by some aides to suspend the election of 1864 - during the US Civil War - but despite the expectation that he would lose, he refused.

"The election is a necessity," Lincoln said. "We cannot have a free government without elections; and if the rebellion could force us to forgo, or postpone, a national election, it might fairly claim to have already conquered us."


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3885663.stm
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,917
Tokens
Bush is Hitler, Bush stole the election, Bush is the terrorist....same old same old from the loonie left.

Guess it's stupid to consider "what if" scenarios. If something did happen and the election results got screwed up, you libs would be screaming "Bush knew there was going to be an attack and did nothing."

Maybe if they delay it 4 more years, your hero Hillary will overtake the presumed assumptive nominee Lurch. She has a better shot anyway.
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
They won't delay the election no matter what ... too much of a stink if they do. But they sure have got your minds off the Edwards naming, haven't they? Sly buggers.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
Bad move on the Pubbie part....I think.

On the other hand look at how the dems would wail and howl if there was an attack 3 days before the election and they lost....You think you were sick of hearing the word "disenfranchised" the first time.

They would want 3 or 4 "do overs" until they won.


Because "Bushes policys made the terroist attack us."...and of coure the NY Times would be first in line with this line of twisted thinking.
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
If the Dems win this fall, I am going to cut and paste every one of your hyperbolic assertions about them and hold you personally accountable for errors in your statements.
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
Two words - SCARE TACTICS.

Fuk that nazi piece of fasicst shit Bush.

I hope he rots in hell.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,263
Messages
13,566,052
Members
100,782
Latest member
rikvipfans1
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com